In the spirit of reading as many facts as possible to build a point of view, I submit this vast research on corona virus from my amazing and brilliant physician. As a scientist, she is completely unbiased in her presentation of these facts. Over time, we will discover which approach(es)worked best. It may be fortuitous that different countries approached this crisis differently, so we will have a basis for evaluating this kind of challenge in the future. Is Sweden’s laissez-faire attitude going to prove the most prescient, or is it the draconian approach of locking down everyone until there are zero deaths? Or maybe the best model is somewhere in the middle? Two-week shutdown and back to work? Only lock down those “at risk?” Which is better for humanity short term? Which is better long term? Lots of questions exist out there. Are we working together to save humanity or are we just losing our freedom? Do the masks actually work or does the virus go right through as some scientists claim and Government is overreaching by forcing their use? Who to save? Young futures or old lives?Are we getting closer to our loved ones or are we sacrificing the educations of our youth? How about herd immunity. Do we lose it for future generations if we isolate now? What are the long term effects of what the financial world is calling The Great Suppression? Will this be a deep V or a long L? Should we be the huddled masses or should we get back to work? I hope you enjoy the various perspectives presented. And please… think for yourself. Don’t immediately delegate your opinions and give your brain up to the local news or to the political leaders. Analyze the data. Read on. Best, Tim

Hello — We have now had over a month of “shelter in place” to combat the spread of COVID-19 and to avoid a surge in hospital admissions that would overwhelm our healthcare system. In California, we have been successful at flattening the curve and our numbers of hospitalizations and deaths…